Mandatory Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options

Medical malpractice lawsuits can take years and come with high costs and stress for everyone involved. Pennsylvania law encourages parties to resolve disputes quickly and efficiently. That’s why options like mandatory arbitration and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have become more common in Philadelphia and across the state. These approaches can provide a faster, less adversarial path to resolve medical negligence claims.

What Is Mandatory Arbitration in Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Cases?

Mandatory arbitration means the parties must present their case to one or more neutral arbitrators—rather than a judge or jury—who then decide the outcome. In some Pennsylvania counties, local court rules require certain medical malpractice disputes to go through arbitration before they proceed to a full trial. The main goal is to ease court schedules and encourage quicker settlements.

The arbitration process is usually less formal than a courtroom trial. Both sides present evidence, question witnesses, and the arbitrators issue a binding or non-binding decision. If the decision is binding, both sides must accept it. If it’s non-binding, either party can still take the case to court. Arbitration can reduce legal costs and help both sides reach a fair outcome without the time and complexity of a trial. A Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyer can explain if your case may be subject to mandatory arbitration.

Mediation and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods

Besides arbitration, Pennsylvania courts often encourage or require mediation in malpractice lawsuits. Mediation brings the parties together with a neutral mediator—often a retired judge or attorney—who helps them negotiate a voluntary settlement. Unlike arbitrators, mediators don’t make a decision for the parties. Instead, they work to find common ground and foster agreement.

Mediation is often ordered early in the litigation process, sometimes within 60 days after the defendant files an answer with the court. According to Pennsylvania’s Health Care Services Malpractice Act, judges may also order mediation at various points to encourage prompt settlements. Mediation and other ADR options (like early neutral evaluation or settlement conferences) can save time, lower costs, and give patients more control over the outcome. Many cases settle during mediation, and parties can avoid the risk of an unpredictable jury verdict.

The Mediation and Arbitration Process Under Pennsylvania Law

Pennsylvania rules set out clear procedures for ADR in medical malpractice cases:

  • Scheduling: Courts may order a discovery conference within 60 days after the answer is filed to discuss mediation and set a discovery plan.
  • Participation: All parties and their attorneys must participate in good faith and share information needed for meaningful negotiation.
  • Mediation Order: Judges can require the parties to participate in at least one mediation session or settlement conference after discovery, and before a trial is set.
  • Settlement: If parties reach agreement, the mediator helps draft a settlement that is submitted to the court for approval.

If mediation doesn’t settle the case, the lawsuit can continue to trial. Arbitration and mediation are both confidential, and statements made cannot be used later in court. Your medical malpractice attorney will guide you through these processes and help you prepare.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Arbitration and ADR in Medical Negligence Cases

Alternative dispute resolution offers many benefits, including speed, privacy, and lower costs. It lets you avoid the uncertainty of a trial and often leads to a mutually acceptable settlement. Mediation, in particular, gives patients and providers a voice in the outcome.

However, ADR may not be right for every case. Sometimes, a binding arbitration decision is final, even if you’re unhappy with the result. In other situations, one side may refuse reasonable settlement offers, forcing the case to trial anyway. It’s important to weigh the pros and cons with your Philly medical malpractice attorney before agreeing to arbitration or mediation.

When Is Alternative Dispute Resolution Not Appropriate?

While ADR is helpful in many situations, it isn’t always the best choice. If the facts are heavily disputed or a case involves large damages and complex legal issues, a full trial may be necessary to get justice. If there’s evidence of fraud, willful concealment, or other wrongdoing by a healthcare provider, a judge or jury trial might be more appropriate. Additionally, some insurance policies and court rules may require you to try ADR before going to court, but they cannot prevent you from having a trial if ADR fails.

An experienced medical malpractice lawyer can evaluate your situation and protect your interests throughout ADR or litigation.

FAQs About Mandatory Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Options

Is arbitration required in every Pennsylvania medical malpractice case?
No, not every case requires arbitration. Some Pennsylvania courts or contracts may require it, but many cases go to mediation or trial instead. Your Philadelphia personal injury lawyer can review your case and advise if arbitration is mandatory.

How is mediation different from arbitration in medical negligence cases?
Mediation helps both parties negotiate a settlement with the aid of a neutral mediator who does not make a binding decision. Arbitration, however, involves a neutral arbitrator or panel who hears evidence and issues a decision that may be binding.

Do I lose my right to a trial if I agree to arbitration or mediation?
If arbitration is binding, you generally cannot take the same claim to trial if you disagree with the outcome. For mediation and many non-binding arbitrations, you still have the right to proceed to trial if there’s no settlement.

Can I have a lawyer represent me in arbitration or mediation?
Yes, you have the right to have a medical malpractice lawyer represent you during any alternative dispute resolution process. Legal guidance ensures you understand your rights and don’t accept less than you deserve.

Other Resources About Understanding Medical Malpractice Law in Pennsylvania

Practice Areas

Get Your Case Evaluation Today for FREE

(215) 227-2727

EMAIL US

TOLL FREE:
(866)-907-2231

NO RECOVERY, NO FEE. GUARANTEED.

Our record of success

Over $500 Million Recovered

$80 Million

Transvaginal mesh jury verdict

$20 Million

Birth INJURY CAUSING BRAIN DAMAGE

$6.75 Million

ATV Accident CAUSING BRAIN DAMAGE

View all Case Results

From our Clients

See more testimonials

I would not have been able to achieve the results and reach the settlement that I was awarded without the legal representation of My Philly Lawyer. Thank you Dean and Frank and your entire team.

Darnell B

My Philly Lawyer represented me for an auto accident. The entire process was a pleasure. I was more than satisfied with the outcome. During a normally stressful time, I was put at ease by the entire staff at My Philly Lawyer and I won’t hesitate to have them represent me again.

Craig R.

MyPhillyLawyer absolutely the best in Philadelphia. Dean, Joshua and Deana are the best and they will get you the results you deserve! I’m so grateful and appreciative for their assistance and support!

Hass M.

My experience with MyPhilly lawyer has been wonderful. There is nothing better than feeling like the team is on your side. The staff has always taken my calls , no matter what time. I’m extremely grateful for MyPhilly lawyer.

Corynna M.

I highly recommend Dean Weitzman. He was empathetic and listened carefully to the impact the accident had upon my physical and mental health. I believe he negotiated the very best settlement he could have gotten.

Christina R.

Their team is absolutely amazing and is there to help you every step of the way. I would highly recommend them, they know there stuff and will do what it takes to help their clients.

Brittany M.